realmadrid 412 Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 I am attempting to view a thread called weightlifting wetting, and I keep getting this message : 2F173/K . The message says contact support, but I don't get any response about this problem. Quote Link to comment
KozmoFox 5,644 Posted April 18, 2017 👮 Moderator Share Posted April 18, 2017 1 hour ago, realmadrid said: I am attempting to view a thread called weightlifting wetting, and I keep getting this message : 2F173/K . The message says contact support, but I don't get any response about this problem. Could you link the thread? Quote Link to comment
realmadrid 412 Posted April 23, 2017 Author Share Posted April 23, 2017 On 4/18/2017 at 2:23 PM, KozmoFox said: Could you link the thread? See just posted the link, and even when posting the link into this thread it tells me "Sorry, we can't show this content because you don't have permission to see it." Quote Link to comment
KozmoFox 5,644 Posted April 23, 2017 👮 Moderator Share Posted April 23, 2017 14 minutes ago, realmadrid said: See just posted the link, and even when posting the link into this thread it tells me "Sorry, we can't show this content because you don't have permission to see it." This topic has been hidden by administration, likely for a wide violation of the following rule: A callous disregard for the privacy and security of others Do not post content recorded without consent (“voyeur”/hidden camera videos, CCTV clips, etc.) Note that this does not apply to consensual (i.e. staged) voyeur scenarios. While this rule does not explicitly state such (this will likely change if this becomes an issue), this sort of thing would fall under the same lines, non-staged non-porn videos containing someone unwittingly wetting themselves. For example, if someone was recording a karate tournament or something, and someone wet themselves during a match and it was caught in said footage, we would likely not allow such content to make the rounds. You get the sort of thing I'm saying? Kyuu and Kei 2 Quote Link to comment
realmadrid 412 Posted April 23, 2017 Author Share Posted April 23, 2017 18 minutes ago, KozmoFox said: This topic has been hidden by administration, likely for a wide violation of the following rule: A callous disregard for the privacy and security of others Do not post content recorded without consent (“voyeur”/hidden camera videos, CCTV clips, etc.) Note that this does not apply to consensual (i.e. staged) voyeur scenarios. While this rule does not explicitly state such (this will likely change if this becomes an issue), this sort of thing would fall under the same lines, non-staged non-porn videos containing someone unwittingly wetting themselves. For example, if someone was recording a karate tournament or something, and someone wet themselves during a match and it was caught in said footage, we would likely not allow such content to make the rounds. You get the sort of thing I'm saying? The thing is that I created the thread, and all of the videos posted in the thread were posted by the people who wet themselves. They did not post it as fetish material, but they did post it intentional. Most of them laughed about the wetting, and made it a big part of the video titles. While I totally agree with avoiding voyeur type videos, I made sure to make a thread of videos where people who wet were okay with it being posted on the web (since they posted it themselves). What do you think? I get the sort of thing you are saying. Quote Link to comment
KozmoFox 5,644 Posted April 23, 2017 👮 Moderator Share Posted April 23, 2017 @realmadridI am not the one that hid the thread, it was hidden before the new mod team was assembled; I'm just giving it my best guess as to why it would be and that is assuredly the closest fit from my point of view. Its especially more problematic and dubious that it became more than one video and got quite some attention; the topic in and of itself invited contribution as it went on and it did in fact have contributors other than you that could not say the same in regards to their own video uploads and posts, now that I'm looking at it. Its certainly a dubious situation, and I can see fully within the lines that "this is difficult and bordering on rule breaking, and some of these are partially rule breaking. Instead of worrying about the specifics of this, I should hide this because it doesn't sit right with me and the rules I have made" kind of thought process. I can understand why it would have been hidden, yes. If you're looking to appeal to have this thread unhidden, it would likely be good to contact Kirito. It is assuredly he who hid the thread, and chain of command and all that. I wouldn't overly count on it though, for the reasons above. However I can assure you, now that the site has a dedicated and expanded staff, such threads can now be monitored more closely and consistently, so things will get to the point an entire topic will have to been hidden far less, I assure you! :) Kei and Kyuu 2 Quote Link to comment
realmadrid 412 Posted April 23, 2017 Author Share Posted April 23, 2017 Ok not a fan of how a lot things have been handled in the past, but I can only hope that with the new team of moderators, there will be better continuity of thread monitoring! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.