Lisk

VIP Member
  • Content count

    685
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

356 Revered

About Lisk

  • Rank
    /人 ⌒ ‿‿ ⌒ 人\
  • Birthday March 25

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://twitter.com/Koshache

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Sexual Orientation
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Motherland

Recent Profile Visitors

13,366 profile views
  1. Today's news articles QR codes:

    - German minister's reaction to Trump's election is a male Spheal

    - Shinzo Abe's upcoming visit is a female Zangoose

    - CNN making Madonna shut up is a female Jynx (lol)

    - Angry cat is a male Nidorino

    - Battle for the airport is a male Donphan

    - Le Pen's speech about EU is a female Pumpkaboo

    - Space industry overview is a female Slugma (what)

    - LELian economy is a male Girafarig

    - Translation of Trump's speech is a male Buizel

    - Finally, the weather report is a female Snivy

    And somehow all of that makes sense!

    1. Lisk

      Lisk

      Oh, I forgot, the scan result was a Calm female Gothita with Competitive. I've caught it in a Luxury ball.

  2. We live in a very interesting age indeed. Let's hope that the benefits of this time of change will outweigh the losses. There's probably most likely both. Naturally, all parties involved would vehemently deny their involvement, so if someone learns the exact amount of involvement, that would be our grandchildren (and even then I doubt that all details will be declassified). Unless, of course, either one of the governments involved collapses, but in the unlikely chance that it does, our top priority would be surviving in the resulting chaos. Indeed Thanks Trump ^_^. That is okay, there won't be much to discuss for the next couple of months until we see how the current administration would act. I have enjoyed this conversation as well, as polite discussions help to realize the weaknesses in one's own reasoning and fill the gaps. But until we see how things would develop, let's turn this thread in a different direction. We already have this: http://www.alcot.biz/product/osana/character_pu.html So... what would loli Trump be like?
  3. >USR

    You've missed an "S", dammit!

    1. EMT

      EMT

      I can never tell if you like or dislike Trump.

    2. Lisk

      Lisk

      I neither like nor doslike him yet. We're yet to see how he will act. With a wildcard like Trump, it'll take at least six months to come up with an opinion that is based on something other than his own speeches. There was a guy who got a Nobel Peace Prize in advance solely because of his speeches, then he destroyed a prosperous country because he didn't like it. Therefore, By their fruit will you recognize them.

      What I do like is how fucked up this whole situation is. It pleases Slaanesh. It also displeases Nurgle, but it can't be helped. Nurgle's Chosen failed to get things done, so he'll have to deal with it.

  4. Loss taking. They didn't expect to lose, not after the effort money they've spent and the media campaign they got. This is actually the weakest spot in my pet conspiracy theory; however, I can't help but think that the current team is desperately grasping at straws. I can't blame them, I was very surprised by Trump's victory myself, but this is probably the most hostile transition I've seen in my life. The usually indecisive Obama is literally doing everything in its power to make things harder for Trump in order to solidify as much of its achievements as possible. It almost reminds me of the time when George [the button above S is missing, please replace] Bush took the office. I believe that John McCain is either in on the con, or his judgment is very clouded, given his past (especially the military service part of it), personality and his previous statements. I will elaborate further on that matter in the next post if you would like me to do so, because that would require digging up quite a bit of source material that I've had at some point, but didn't keep for the future use. Yes, that was my point exactly. But that brings us back to the media distrust issue I've brought up before. Where exactly should we draw the border between a biased opinion and a blatant lie?
  5. No pet theories yet, unfortunately, but when I encounter dubious information in the mainstream media and don't have enough data to create a solid theory, my first thought is cui prodest. Since media manipulation is what the democrats are good at, and given the large-scale media attack on Trump, it is likely to be a part of their campaign. What is the opposite of Putin's trolls from Putin's troll factories? Obama's elves? Those guys, for the reason stated in the post above. In that sense, it doesn't even matter where it started. What does matter is the fact that it started to spread. However, as the traditional media outlets have started to lose their credibility, social networks quickly began to catch up. Which is not surprising, really - you can choose any truth you want. I wonder if the future historians would see DNC and GOP as the branches of some kind of religion, like Shia and Sunni muslims or the branches of Christian church, but I digress. 4chan can be accessed by anyone and it already had that Piss For Equality prank thing, so I wouldn't be surprised if this scenario also started there. But, as I said, it doesn't really matter. It's like the zombie outbreak: even if you find the Patient Zero, secure them and use them to create the cure, it wouldn't change the fact that the world is already screwed up.
  6. Ah, I apologize for not explaining my reasoning here. While pulling an Umineko-type gambit is one of my goals, it is not the cause for that. The actual issue is not my belief, but my disbelief, as my opinion of official media in general took a nosedive over the course of this electoral period. The official media, both liberal and conservative (but especially liberal) sources were sticking to a certain pattern way too many times. Here's how it goes: A: "According to CIA, X is Y. They have the evidence, but they refuse to disclose it for secrecy reasons." B: ""X is Y" - reveals CIA sourse that preferred to remain anonymous. What could it mean? Our opinion on the recent article by A's reporter." C: "According to A and B, X is Y." D-F: "X is Y! X is Y! X is Y!" Repeat ad nauseam. Therefore, while I normally prefer to gather data on the subjects that interest me from multiple sources that represent both sides, this time I'm just going with the flow. The noise to signal ratio is too high to even bother, and the assorted "experts" are basically nonfactors. Luckily, we're not those "experts" and we're doing it solely for our mutual amusement, so it's okay. Debatable, but I think that there was already a discussion about that before and ultimately everyone agreed to disagree, so there's not much to add. Indeed. Attacking the property of the president (regardless of who that president is) is a very clear signal. Their issue, however, would not be with Trump as a person, but with Trump as the leader of the army that is officially fighting with against them.
  7. YOUTUBE HITLER

    YOUTUBE HITLER

    YOUTUBE HITLER

    1. Zapdos

      Zapdos

      (luigi bias)

    2. JustCallum

      JustCallum

      I think I missed that episode of Spongebob

  8. Despite their claims, terrorists rarely do what they do in response to something. They're terrorists, they're doing their things to promote themselves and make themselves look stronger. When radical islamists attacked radical democrats from Charlie Hebdo, they didn't do so because of so-called art produced by charlists that insulted their religion. They were sent there by their superiors to give a message: "We can kill you in your own country and there's nothing you can do about it. Fear us." Besides, fighting against terrorism is what any administration would have done. Iraqi forces and international coalition that supports them began their attempts to kick DAISH from Mosul under Obama's watch, and it would be silly to think that DAISH won't try to retaliate. Stopping them from doing so is the reason why police and special forces exist. But if, say, Mexicans try to protest against building The Wall (C)(R)(TM) and their riots go out of hand to the point where the government will have to use military force to stop them, and there will be casualties among the uninvolved, that counts. As for the dossier, no. DDB and Al-Jazeera are prodemocratic to the core, and even if they weren't, the current state of media in general leaves much to be desired. I wouldn't even believe Trump himself if he admits it. Especially if he does admit it. We'll probably never learn whether it really happened or not, unless someone leaks a video of it actually happening, so let's believe what we believe in.
  9. contest

    pulled in to support maid things
  10. But I didn't deny that Trump woud cause some kind of an international crisis. He's is by any means no dove. It's just that his focus would be shifted towards China. The focus of attention is shifting, and that's good for me. The more imbalance, the better. However, I don't think that the incident would happen this soon. It will take time. By "incident" I mean something really major, like the stance of the US on Iranian nuclear deal, EU/NATO policy and Obama's anti-Russian sanctions. Starting yet another war in the Middle East also counts. I say that these events are unlikely to take place until the middle of this year. Let's say July 4th (for no real reason, I just like it). If it happens sooner than that, or if it doesn't happen at all until the end of Trum's term, I'd be very, very surprised. I'm already surprised that Trump was allowed to be elected (or that Obama failed to crown its successor), so who knows? Realistically speaking, we should give him at least a month on the real duty before we start making predictions. But that shouldn't stop us from gambling. No major disaster-inducing incident in the international relationships between US and another country that would lead to bloodshed will happen until the 4th of July, 2017. I've said it in lime green that only russian hackers can use. If it does happen, that would mean that I've lost and people died. In that case, I'd post a redaction.
  11. It depends on how you live, really. I'm currently living with my gradnma (or more likely she's living with me), because she needs my help because of situations. She did everything she could do for me when I was a wee kid, so now it's my turn to take care of her.
  12. The God-Emperor of Mankind did do that indeed. That's what the documents say, right? Reputations mean nothing, since killarists are going all-in at this monent, but still. According to this so-called "report", US is just another Bananastan, where elections can be swayed be an outside force as it wants them to be swayed. Killary didn't lose because it called half of its electoral base "deplorables" and was generally retarded, it lost because of the dreaded Russian Hackers. Isn't. That. Cute? I'd cuddle it and tell it that everything will be okay, if it wasn't twice as old as I am and therefore almost expired.
  13. More like for years. tl;dr: when NATO started to push eastwards after the collapse of the Soviet Union, people were disturbed, but thought that we can be friends. When NATO attacked and destroyed Yugoslavia, everyone freaked out and most people realized that Russia will eventually be the next on its hit list. The last doubts were cleared when Bush and his cronies invaded Iraq. ColinPowell.jpg.
  14. Z-Lillie's skirt got a bit wet

    1. blooper

      blooper

      Lewd alert activated! Alliance suppression forces inbound.